- From: Janet Daly <janet@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:33:13 -0500
- To: w3c-ac-members@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org
Dear W3C Advisory Committee Representative, I am pleased to advance the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (UAAG 1.0) to Candidate Recommendation status in response to the Working Group Chair's request, archived in W3C member space at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2000JanMar/0086.html The User Agent Guidelines Working Group will use this review period to study a particular implementation issue: to what extent the W3C DOM can ensure communication between general purpose user agents (graphical browsers, text browsers, media players, etc.) and assistive technologies (screen readers, screen magnifiers, speech recognition software, alternative keyboards, etc.). Implementation experience for other checkpoints has been documented. Review comments should be sent to w3c-wai-ua@w3.org before 18 February 2000. This is a public mailing list. Advancement of a document to Candidate Recommendation is an explicit call for implementation experience and technical feedback from W3C members and the developer community at large. More information about Candidate Recommendation is available in the 11 November 2000 Process Document. http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Process-19991111/tr.html#RecsCR ================= About the UAAG 1.0 Candidate Recommendation Title: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Date: 28 January 2000 URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/ Last Call Working Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105/ Editors: Jon Gunderson, U. of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Chair Ian Jacobs, W3C Abstract: The guidelines in this document explain to developers how to design user agents that are accessible to people with disabilities. User agents include graphical desktop browsers, multimedia players, text browsers, voice browsers, plug-ins, and other assistive technologies that give full access to Web content. While these guidelines primarily address the accessibility of general-purpose graphical user agents (including communication with assistive technologies), the principles presented apply to other types of user agents as well. Following these principles will make the Web accessible to users with disabilities and will benefit all users. Status of This Document: This is the Candidate Recommendation of User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. The User Agent Guidelines Working Group does not anticipate making any significant changes to this document and therefore encourages implementation experience and comment from developers during this Candidate Recommendation review. However, this is still a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. The Candidate Recommendation review period ends on 18 February 2000. Please send comments about this document to the public mailing list w3c-wai-ua@w3.org (public archives). During the Candidate Recommendation review, the Working Group will study how the requirements of this document are satisfied by deployed user agents and with what level of success or difficulty. The Working Group anticipates asking the W3C Director to advance this document to Proposed Recommendation and will present its findings at that time. ================= Minority Opinions Some Working Group participants dissented on the resolution to one issue: whether the priority of documenting active user-preferences for input configurations (such as keyboard bindings) should be the same priority as for author-specified configurations. The Working Group welcomes feedback on this issue. The minority opinion is available at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2000JanMar/0178.html ================= Candidate Recommendation Support Materials Techniques Document. This document suggests some techniques for satisfying the checkpoints in the guidelines document. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-TECHS-20000128 Implementation Report. This is a preliminary report of how deployed user agents satisfy the checkpoints. http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-IMP-20000126/ List of document changes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/wai-ua-wd-changes.html Resolved Issues list: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2000/01/issues-linear-20000127 User Agent Responsibilities. This document explains how Working Group decided that the requirements in the guidelines were appropriate for general purpose user agents. http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2000/01/ua-resp-20000125 Impact Matrix. This document explains which audiences are most likely to benefit from each checkpoint. http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2000/01/WD-UAGL-impact-matrix-20000121 ================= Working Group Goals During Candidate Recommendation 1) Demonstrate that the W3C DOM can ensure communication between general purpose user agents and assistive technologies Assistive technologies provide full access to the Web by providing specialized services. To do so, they require information about content and user interface from general purpose user agents. 2) Complete the implementation report based on vendor reviews of their own products. 3) Refine and improve the Techniques Document. ================= About the User Agent Guidelines Working Group Working Group Home Page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/ Working Group Charter: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/wai-ua-charter WAI Home Page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR. ================= Janet Daly, Head of Public Relations for Tim Berners-Lee, Director
Received on Friday, 28 January 2000 17:33:01 UTC