- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 22:23:30 -0800 (PST)
- To: ij@w3.org, schwer@us.ibm.com
- Cc: phoenixl@netcom.com, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Hi, Actually, the methodology does handle spanned cells. The nested table navigation is dependent on how nested tables are represented which is why I didn't include it. I believe that the level of abstraction is probably great enough to allow for different types. The table navigation is probably better left to the assistive technology developers. I guess one question is how much of a browser will access technology need to become? Scott > User agents should not be considered with table navigation because it is an > unwarranted burden on them. This should be left up to the assistive > technology. The example mentioned below does not deal with an embedded > table or cells spanning multiple columns. The task is very complex. > Furthermore, your table navigation mechansim may need to change for > different types of devices. > > Rich
Received on Wednesday, 29 December 1999 01:23:33 UTC