- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:32:14 -0500
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- CC: Denis Anson <danson@miseri.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
"Leonard R. Kasday" wrote: > > Sorry, What I meant was that if they don't use the standard API interface, > they provide some other API, a way to interact with it, and documentation > explaining how to do it so that people don't have to reverse engineer it. > > This would be in practice a link to their internal interface. I'm assuming > that most software design has some sort of clean interface even if it > doesn't follow the operating system standards. > > Since their may be valid implementation problems even with this, priority > would be less than 1. I think this will be addressed by the resolution of the Austin face-to-face meeting for issue #114. In fact, no specific interface will be required, but preference will be in order of platform-independent, system-standard, accessible proprietary. - Ian http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#114
Received on Thursday, 16 December 1999 15:33:04 UTC