Re: UA Guideline review, rev. 1

• From: Earl Johnson <Earl.Johnson@eng.sun.com>
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 11:05:01 -0800 (PST)
• To: unagi69@concentric.net
• Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
• Message-Id: <199912031905.LAA14540@taller.eng.sun.com>

> aloha, earl!
> 
	Back at you.

> thanks for the review -- i really like the idea of splitting guideline 5 a la
> guideline 4
> 
	For clarification I'm suggesting this basic format be used on
	all of the guidelines containing a mixture of UI and content
	checkpoints. And while the search for removable checkpoints may
	prove fruitless, this approach still provides a form of
	checkpoint reduction. Engineers working on the overall UI will
	be able to see which of the checkpoints apply to them as will
	those working on the content parser. By identifying which of
	these 2 buckets the checkpoint falls into, the structure makes
	it easy for these engineers to filter out checkpoints that
	aren't relevant to them.

ej

Received on Friday, 3 December 1999 14:05:03 UTC