- From: John Gardner <john.gardner@orst.edu>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 09:42:32 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
The distinction between haptic and tactile is that haptic is intrinsically duynamic. For example, force-feedback devices like joysticks and haptic mice either move or respont to motion by the user. Braille is tactile but not haptic, because it sits still and doesn't change in response to the motion of the user's fingers. Hope this helps. John At 09:53 AM 12/1/99 -0600, you wrote: >Regrading John Gardners comments on tactile vs haptic... > >from dictionary.com >tactile, adj. -Perceptible to the sense of touch; >haptic, adj. - Of or relating to the sense of touch; tactile. > >common understanding of braille usage is through the sense of touch, many >people are confused or are unsure of the term haptic. I would have no >problem changing it to "tactile" > >Jim Allan, Statewide Technical Support Specialist >Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired >1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 >voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9453 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ >"Be BOLD and mighty forces will come to your aid." Basil King > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On >Behalf Of Ian Jacobs >Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 8:17 AM >To: John Gardner >Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org >Subject: Re: Review of UA Last Call Document > > >John Gardner wrote: >> 1c. Braille is tactile, not haptic. > >We had some discussion of this as well on 24 November and it >was minuted that Braille is haptic. We'll have to review that >(or just delete the term from the document). > > John A. Gardner Professor and Director, Science Access Project Department of Physics Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 tel: (541) 737 3278 FAX: (541) 737 1683 SAP URL: http://dots.physics.orst.edu/
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 1999 12:40:20 UTC