W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 1999

AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Telecon 1 September 1999

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:51:02 -0700
Message-Id: <4.1.19990830104540.00c71f10@staff.uiuc.edu>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
WAI UA Telecon for September 1st, 1999 

Chair: Jon Gunderson 
Date: Wednesday, September 1st
Time: 12:00 noon to 1:30 pm Eastern Standard Time 
Call-in: W3C Tobin Bridge (+1) 617-252-7000


Open Action Items

   1.JG: Draft outline for section 5.3.3 of techniques document. 

   2.IJ: Run NN (and Mozilla) through guidelines. 

   3.IJ: Issue 56 resolution 
     a) Mention media objects as example in checkpoint 1.6. 
     b) List as example in checkpoint 9.6 
     c) Incorporate media objects into 10.5 and 10.6. 

     a) Add links to WG page with disclaimer about volatility of Working
Drafts and products. 
     b) Proposed disclaimer to be inserted in evaluations. 

   5.IJ Send proposal to WCAG to propose different wording on the
requirement for text rendering by UAs. 

   6.IJ: Create a list of metadata elements and techniques for HTML 

   7.HB, RS: Look at techniques document. 

   8.HB: Run pwWebSpeak (with Mark H.) through the guidelines. 

   9.GR: Run Hal through the guidelines. 

  10.DP: Technique 3.6 - Propose techniques 

  11.DP: Run Jaws for Windows through the guidelines. 

  12.KB: Fill in the table for UAGL and coordinate with Wendy Chisholm of
Web Content 

  13.GG: Review proposal for techniques for accessing content. 

  14.RS: Coordinate review of HomePage reader. 

  15.CMN: Send proposal to the UA list about including an implementation
period as part of the 
recommendation process 

  16.CMN: Propose something about schemas. 

  17.CMN: Talk to Dan Brickley about document structure and site mapping.
Will send a list of 
tools that make use of meta information to the list. 

  18.JA: Compose list of metadata sources for CSS. (e.g., generated text) 

  19.Marja: Compose list of metadata sources for SMIL. 

  20.RS: Consider the "applicability clause" and propose rewording of the
conformance statement for checkpoints. 

  21.RS: Post list of checkpoints at issue to the list related to review of
Home Page Reader. 

  22.Reviewers: Read conformance section of guidelines before testing
sub-grouping of checkpoints with current products 

  23.Reviewers: Should be as specific as possible about product versions,
os versions, etc. 


     1. REMINDER: Register for October F2F Meeting 

     2. LAST CALL: Timing and document preparation 

     3. Issue #79: How do specialized browsers like pwWebSpeak and IBM
Homepage Reader conform to the guidelines 

     4. Issue #77: Validate conformance categories 

     5. Configuration Checkpoints for Guideline 9

     7. Issue #78: 78 Ian Jacobs Review requirements for window spawning 
Received on Monday, 30 August 1999 11:46:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:38:22 UTC