Re: comments on working draft

Ian Jacobs wrote:
> 

> > MR: General comments: I support the suggestion that we arrange the
> > guidelines in roughly order of importance. I would vote to place
> > 11 and 12 (W3C technologies and OS conventions) nearer the top
> > and 6 (document styles), 9 (orientation) and 10 (notify of changes)
> > toward the end, for example. But 1 and 2 probably belong in sequence,
> > despite any difference in importance, and there may be other logical
> > orders that should be preserved.
> 
> Guideline order was on the agenda for yesterday, but we didn't get to
> it.
> We'll take your comments into account when we discuss it.
> 
> [This is something we wanted to do for WCAG as well but opted not
> to at the end.]

See latest proposal for guideline order [1]:

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999JulSep/0185.html

  - Ian

Received on Tuesday, 24 August 1999 17:08:35 UTC