- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:08:17 -0400
- To: Madeleine Rothberg <Madeleine_Rothberg@wgbh.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Ian Jacobs wrote: > > > MR: General comments: I support the suggestion that we arrange the > > guidelines in roughly order of importance. I would vote to place > > 11 and 12 (W3C technologies and OS conventions) nearer the top > > and 6 (document styles), 9 (orientation) and 10 (notify of changes) > > toward the end, for example. But 1 and 2 probably belong in sequence, > > despite any difference in importance, and there may be other logical > > orders that should be preserved. > > Guideline order was on the agenda for yesterday, but we didn't get to > it. > We'll take your comments into account when we discuss it. > > [This is something we wanted to do for WCAG as well but opted not > to at the end.] See latest proposal for guideline order [1]: [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999JulSep/0185.html - Ian
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 1999 17:08:35 UTC