- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:37:39 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: schwer@us.ibm.com, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I think there should be some slight rewording:
8.5 allow the user to search for renderable content
and I am not sure if it is a P1 or not so lone as the ability to find it
manually by reading the document is already provided elsewhere.
8.4 Allow the user to navigate among only the active elements in the document
If it is already possible to navigate each element individually, and know
what type of element it is (or at least whether it is an active type of
element) then I think this is a P2 requirement. It seems to be well
established that it is a P2 requirement for blind users and for people with
limited mobility (which could go into a user impact matrix)
Charles McCN
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Ian Jacobs wrote:
schwer@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> Sections 8.4 and 8.5 should be a priority 1 requirement.
Just to quote them from the 9 August draft [1]:
8.4 Allow the user to navigate among all active elements
in the document. [Priority 2]
8.5 Allow the user to search for rendered text content,
including alternative text content. [Priority 2]
[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WAI-USERAGENT-19990809
--
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 1999 12:37:42 UTC