- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:47:33 -0500
- To: Olivier Borius <oborius.fidev@wanadoo.fr>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Olivier, Thank you for the comments. Due to my own scheduling constraints, I have not been able to incorporate any changes into the UA Guidelines since the 9 March draft. We will be publishing this draft to the TR page tonight or tomorrow. Your comments are appreciated and will be considered by the working group and incorporated into the next draft. > Second, we would like to make some comments about some checkpoints : > - checkpoint 5.3.1 : must be a priority 1 In the 10 March teleconf [1], the WG discussed the priority of this checkpoint (Allow the user to navigate sequentially among links.). It was decided to ensure that priority of 6.2.1 as Priority 1 (Allow the user to navigate sequentially among all active elements in the document.) and to keep the special case of just links as a priority 2. I don't think this discuss has ended yet. [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/1999/03/wai-ua-telecon-19990310.html#minutes > - checkpoint 5.3.5 : the number of links is important, > but the number of visited and/or unvisited links also The working group will discuss this proposal. > - checkpoint 6.1.11 : must be a priority 1, but there is not the > same level of priority between knowing "whether loading has stalled", > knowing "whether enough of the page has loaded to begin navigating", > and "whether following a link involves a fee", which can be indeed priority 3 So you are proposing creating more than one checkpoint (which we sometimes do when one contains too much information)? The working group will discuss this proposal. Thank you again, - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 1999 19:49:28 UTC