- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:08:03 -0500 (EST)
- To: Kitch Barnicle <kitch@afb.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
It seems to me fine that there is a set of accessibility features which are provided in one place, so long as they are also avilable in relevant parts of the full user interface. For example, Controlling whether ALT text is rendered is an accessibility feature. It is also a general presentation issue, along the lines of font sizes (which are themselves accessibility controls) and the controls make sense grouped together in a set of rendering controls. In an index, one might expect to find: * ALT text, rendering of * alternative content * rendering controls * accessibility controls all referring to the same point. (I should point out that this is an arbitrary example. Another product might group alternative content with image and multimedia handling.) I think we should also point out what we think of as accessibility features. As a start, I would include those things which are mentioned as checkpoints. Charles McCN On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Kitch Barnicle wrote: Access to features that effect a user agent's accessibility should be integrated into the user agent's menus and dialogs. Developers should avoid regrouping accessibility features into specialized menus. Documentation includes any instructional or reference material associated with the user agent including user manuals, help systems, reference cards, and registration materials. Users must have access to installation information, either in electronic form on a diskette or CD or by telephone. [Checkpoint 4.1.3] Describe product features known to promote accessibility in a section of the product documentation. [Priority 2] For instance, include references to accessibility features in these places: 1.Indexes. Include terms related to product accessibility in the documentation index (e.g., "accessibility", "disability" or "disabilities"). 2.Tables of Contents. Include terms related to product accessibility in the documentation table of contents (e.g., features that promote accessibility) 3.Include instructions on how to modify all user configurable defaults and preferences (e.g, set the default font, turn images on or off) as specified by the documentation. 4.Include a list of all keyboard shortcuts in the accessibility section of the documentation. [Checkpoint 4.1.2] Ensure that all product documentation conforms to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines ([WAI-PAGEAUTH]). [Priority 1] Electronic documentation created in open standard formats such as HTML, XML and ASCII can often be accessed in the user's choice of application such as a word processor or browser. Accessing documentation in familiar applications is particularly important to users with disabilities who must learn the functionalities of their tools, be able to configure them for their needs, and to be compatible with assistive technology. Users with print impairments may need or desire documentation in alternative formats such as Braille, large print, or audio tape. User agent manufacturers may provide user manuals in alternative formats. If necessary, manufacturers should contract with third party providers of accessible materials to have their documentation converted into braille, large print or audio tape. Instructions should be created in an input device-independent manner. Provide instructions for using or configuring the user agent in a manner that can be understood by a user of any input device, including a mouse or keyboard. For example, "Select the Home button on the toolbar or select "Home" from the Go menu to return to the Home page. " --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 12 March 1999 14:08:13 UTC