- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:06:19 -0500
- To: Charles Oppermann <chuckop@microsoft.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Charles Oppermann wrote: > > I'm not asking the WG or the W3C to endorse any vendor specific technology. > Likewise, the WG shouldn't just say > > "Priority 1: Implement DOM Level 1" > > Okay - let's say we did exactly that. Would it help accessibility? > Currently not. I still think the WG shuld say "Implement DOM Level 1" even if that doesn't solve the entire problem today. This would be one of the WG's choices that refers to future solutions, not legacy solutions. I agree that without exporting the DOM, its utility is reduced. I propose that we (again) invite someone from the DOM WG to enlighten us during a teleconf. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Received on Thursday, 28 January 1999 18:06:22 UTC