- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:12:14 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Tables Issue Resolution for Desktop Graphical User Agents The solution strategy for Desktop Graphical User Agents for making tables more accessible is for user agents to implement the Document Object Model (DOM) and provide an interface for assistive technology to access DOM. Assistive technology therefore would have direct access to table information for alternaive rendering in speech, Braille or enlarged text. Advantages to DOM approach 1. Assistive technology has direct access to element information and is not dependent on any filtering of information that occurs during graphical rendering of information. 2. W3C recommendations exist for specifying implementation and conformance Potential Disadvantage of DOM approach 1. Technique needs to gain acceptance by assistive technology developers. So far this has not been a problem since Henter-Joyce, Productivity Works and Alva participants are either already using DOM or are interested in its capabilities. Primary checkpoints for Desktop Graphical User Agents to implement 1. Implement DOM level 1 2. Expose DOM level 1 to assistive technologies Checkpoint under consideration and refinement 1. Provide a means for the user to add accessibility functionality or change the rendering of a document using the scripting capabilities of the user agent Issues related to this checkpoint 1. Intent is provide some way for user to adjust rendering or add functionality for legacy assistive technology by using scripting tools already available in many desktop graphical user agent technologies. 2. This is not a good checkpoint since it is too specific, but could be a technique for a more general checkpoint. 3. This may be a good checkpoint if it was more general, but if it was more general it could probably be defined as an asssitive technology. It therefore would not need to exist. 4. There is a DOM2 working group defining user side scripting capability, need to coordinate with that group and see how this issue relates to the work of that group. Checkpoints related to native table linearization by desktop graphical user agents have been rejected based on the following information. Potetential Advantage of Linearization Approach 1. Current screen reader users would have somewhat better access to table information, but it is not a complete solution. Users would still need to wait for it to be implemented before they could benefit from the feature. Problems with linearization approach 1. Linearization is only one of many techniques in solving the table access problem, it doesn't meet the requirement for checkpoints stating a general user problem. It could be included as a technique in the technique document. 2. It doesn't provide a path for innovation in solving table access issues and will become outdated as technology improves. 3. Navigation and rendering are needed for a complete solution, which complicates the desktop graphical browser issue. 4. None of the assistive technology vendors currently involved in the group have requested the inclusion of this feature. Their interest seems to be more in the area of DOM or accessibility APIs for access to tables. 5. Mainstream browser developers have indicated that this feature is technically difficult to implement. It would take a long time for user agent developers to implement and therefore maybe obsolete before users would be able to benefit from the technique. If you have additional information that would change or extend this resoution please send it to the list as soon as possible for consideration by the group. Jon Chair UA working group Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 1999 18:11:20 UTC