Chuck, It has always been my opinion that if we focus on the functionality that must be provided, and not on the methods to produce that functionality, then the same rules can be applied to mainstream browsers, kiosks, and other specialty settings. It's no less important to have access to the information in other settings, just the implementation methods change. Denis Anson, MS, OTR Assistant Professor Computer Access Specialist College Misericordia 301 Lake Street Dallas, PA 18612 RESNA The International Organization of Assistive Technology Professionals Member since 1989 -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Charles (Chuck) Oppermann Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 1:05 AM To: dd@w3.org Cc: Jon Gunderson; w3c-wai-ua@w3.org Subject: RE: UA ISSUE OF THE WEEK: Table element access << The current charter has a broad scope in terms of what kind of User Agent it considers, and although I think it's important we produce guidelines for everybody, from voice agent to kiosque, I think it's even more important that we do mainstream browser first. >> Agreed. The problem that the WG needs to solve is with mainstream *browsers* first, mainstream media players next and then investigate other types of user agents. That's my opinion of course. -Chuck
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 1999 11:01:03 UTC