- From: Denis Anson <danson@miseri.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:17:01 -0500
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Charles (Chuck) Oppermann" <chuckop@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "WAI UA group" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <NCBBJFEKMOPIHFHNBHMMCEMMCBAA.danson@miseri.edu>
Rather than think in terms of font size, it might make more sense to think in terms of viewport bandwidth. By which I mean, if the display shows less than 40 characters per line, and fewer than 12 lines on the screen at a time. The advantage of thinking in these terms is that we address the real issue, which is the fact that the browser can render only a small amount of information at a time. This would include screen magnified browsers, large font sizes, and small screen sizes also. I recognize that modern displays can't be thought of in terms of 80x24 character grids, but that does convey, in a general way, the issues of limited window size. Denis Anson, MS, OTR Assistant Professor Computer Access Specialist College Misericordia 301 Lake Street Dallas, PA 18612 RESNA The International Organization of Assistive Technology Professionals Member since 1989 -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile Sent: Monday, January 11, 1999 6:09 PM To: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann Cc: WAI UA group Subject: RE: UA ISSUE OF THE WEEK: Table element access On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote: I simply don't understand the proposal. It appears that all the Checkpoints, from 1 through 8 only apply to specialized browsers and not mainstream browsers such as Internet Explorer. Am I understanding this correctly? CMN:: Not quite. The way I read Magnified screen means that a large font size (say 48+ point, although there is no good way of defining this) on a 'mainstream browser' would qualify - in which case they all apply to IE, unless you make it restrict available font sizes. I don't think that is the intended result. Hence my 'counter proposal' (I know it is long, but I did think quite hard before I wrote it, so I hope people will actually read to the end. Or even read the proposal itself, which is quite short, and skip the preamble) Charles McCN --Charles McCathieNevile - mailto:charles@w3.org phone: * +1 (617) 258 0992 * http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative - http://www.w3.org/WAI 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, USA
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 08:15:15 UTC