- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 14:29:39 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- cc: WAI UA group <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I am not sure if this is the case, and I doubt that it will continue to be the case. Palmtops are capable of interfacing with computer devices, and could be used for example to provide assistive access to kiosks, ATMs and other public information devices. They are also, in essence, little computers which can run software. Since they could be used as a personal assistive device, a User agent designed for a palmtop should where possible provide an interface. More to the point, if we say now that this is not necessary, and then decide in a year or two that it would have been a good idea, we are doing a disservice to developers. If we think that it is not very useful now, but we expect it to be necessary in two years, we should flag that by requiring it 'where possible'. That provides a common-sense test. It also notifies designers now that their products may have to be extended to provide a particular functionality in the future - this can make life a lot easier than having to retrofit accessibility into a product afterwards. Charles McCathieNevile On Fri, 1 Jan 1999, Jon Gunderson wrote: Technologies like palm tops I do not think have any assistive technologies, so it maybe impossible for it to be compatible with assistive technology. If it wants to provide access to people with visual impiarments it would need to directly implement the user agent techniques that appply to Braille ad Auditory rendering.
Received on Saturday, 2 January 1999 14:29:42 UTC