- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 04:54:03 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At the meeting on wednesday it was noted tht Chris Weaver had asked about the Authoring Tools group and their approach to MathML and W3C specifications. In the draft of May 6 - http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990506 checkpoint 2.1 (the first checkpoint) is "use applicable W3C specifications". So where a w3c recommendation exists such as MathML it is a P2 requirement that it be used rather than another method. Also, things like namespaces are included in this, which will make life a lot easier. If User Agent does the same, it will not only provide consistency which is not a bad thing, but provide a general mechanism for dealing with a number of problems. For example, the MathML one largely seems to be resolved - MathML, DOM, namespaces, XHTML (especially modularised) allows the incoporation of MathML and the required navigation information in a simple manner. (or so it seems to me on a cursory glance) Charles --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 21 May 1999 04:54:07 UTC