- From: mark novak <menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 16:46:54 -0500
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At 3:53 PM -0500 5/6/99, Jon Gunderson wrote: >Response in JRG: > >At 02:51 PM 5/6/99 -0500, mark novak wrote: >>i'd also vote that we do not need a checkpoint for sequential access to >>elements >>which have an ACCESSKEY. >> >>what i'd expect to happen in those cases where more than one element >>had the "same" ACCESSKEY, is that i'd be able to navigate between those >>elements by repeatedly typing that same ACCESSKEY, which is basically >>sequential access of sorts...otherwise, I think we already have access to the >>element by virtue of the ACCESSKEY. > >JRG: That was the intention of the word sequential, if you have a better >phrasing please post to the list. MN: wasn't trying to reword, still suggesting this checkpoint is not needed. > >>I do have another question however: >> >>Do we need a checkpoint for a "where am I" function, something that >>would return information such as page title, location on page, element >>with focus, previous page title was, summary, etc., while navigating >>with in a page? > >JRG: That is in the section under orientation. >Section 6 in the current guidelines. MN: great. suggest we add a link from navigation section also, it that is easily possible. >Jon > > >> >> >> >> >>At 11:00 AM -0500 5/6/99, Jon Gunderson wrote: >>>In response to CMN: >>>The sequential statement is due to the potential multiple definitions of >>>the same accesskey in a document. If more than one control, link, label, >>>... uses the same accesskey we want people to be able to navigate to each >>>one. In the case of single definitions of an accesskey in a document then >>>the sequential part is a mute point, the focus would move directly to that >>>associated focusable element. >>>Jon >>> >>>At 11:44 AM 5/6/99 -0400, you wrote: >>>>I don't think that we should not have a checkpoint for ACCESSKEY. I do >think >>>>that a checkpoint requiring sequential access to elements which have an >>>>ACCESSKEY is inappropriate - the purpose of the element is to provide >access >>>>to certain elements in a non-sequential manner. >>>> >>>>Charles McCN >>>> >>>Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP >>>Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology >>>Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services >>>University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign >>>1207 S. Oak Street >>>Champaign, IL 61820 >>> >>>Voice: 217-244-5870 >>>Fax: 217-333-0248 >>>E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu >>>WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund >>> http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess >> >Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP >Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology >Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services >University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign >1207 S. Oak Street >Champaign, IL 61820 > >Voice: 217-244-5870 >Fax: 217-333-0248 >E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu >WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund > http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Thursday, 6 May 1999 18:08:17 UTC