- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 11:00:29 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
In response to CMN: The sequential statement is due to the potential multiple definitions of the same accesskey in a document. If more than one control, link, label, ... uses the same accesskey we want people to be able to navigate to each one. In the case of single definitions of an accesskey in a document then the sequential part is a mute point, the focus would move directly to that associated focusable element. Jon At 11:44 AM 5/6/99 -0400, you wrote: >I don't think that we should not have a checkpoint for ACCESSKEY. I do think >that a checkpoint requiring sequential access to elements which have an >ACCESSKEY is inappropriate - the purpose of the element is to provide access >to certain elements in a non-sequential manner. > >Charles McCN > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Thursday, 6 May 1999 11:55:09 UTC