- From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 17:57:58 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Per our discussion today, here's a possible checkpoint and technique. Checkpoint: Allow the user to learn of attributename="value" pairs for any element. Priority: 3 Technique: The meta-information about an element contained in attribute values can support the understanding of the containing element, or its descendents. It should be exposable by user request. Details: Many attributes are implicitly present, so the presence in an element of an attribute=value pair cannot be depended upon for information. It is up to the semantic description of each attribute name and its allowed values for an element type to indicate both the explicit meaning of the attribute, and what is the defaulting meaning of a missing attribute. Often this meaning can be determined from the value of the same-named attribute on an ancestor element. Other times the semantics indicate no inheritance (e.g., an id, a document- unique identifier for referencing a particular element). Some attributes are generally applicable to all or most element types. For these, common understanding of their use is reasonable to expect for authors and users. Search on attributename and possibly value is important. Search may be on the next attributename, or on attribute value, possibly inherited, possibly qualified by element name. Each search returns the next occurrence of the containing element. An implementation possibility is to list all matches, and return them in order to the user. Another useful result is to learn the different attributename="value" pairs or a subset of them for any particular element. Another useful search is to find the next element that can have a particular attributename, and for it seeking its default value, possibly from the nearest ancestor. Details for HTML 4.0: These common attributes are associated with almost all HTML 4.0 element types, and can be learned: % attrs "%coreattrs; %i18n; %events;" including: % coreattrs "id ID #IMPLIED -- document-wide unique id -- class CDATA #IMPLIED -- space separated list of classes -- style %StyleSheet; #IMPLIED -- associated style info -- ELEMENT TYPES WITHOUT %attrs; but with %coreattrs BDR -- bi-directional override-- BR -- forced line break -- HR -- horizontal rule -- % i18n lang %LanguageCode; #IMPLIED -- language code -- dir (ltr|rtl) #IMPLIED -- direction for weak/neutral text --" ELEMENT TYPES WITHOUT %attrs; but with %i18n; HTML, HEAD -- lang, dir defaults for document -- META, TITLE -- lang, dir, for use with content -- STYLE -- lang, dir, for use with title in HEAD -- % events; "onclick %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer button was clicked -- ondblclick %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer button was double clicked-- onmousedown %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer button was pressed down -- onmouseup %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer button was released -- onmouseover %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer was moved onto -- onmousemove %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer was moved within -- onmouseout %Script; #IMPLIED -- a pointer was moved away -- onkeypress %Script; #IMPLIED -- a key was pressed and released -- onkeydown %Script; #IMPLIED -- a key was pressed down -- onkeyup %Script; #IMPLIED -- a key was released --" ELEMENT type without %attrs; but with %events; (and %coreatts;) HR -- horizontal rule, takes space, has no text -- ELEMENT types with none of %attrs;, %coreatts;, %i18n;, or %events; PARAM BASE SCRIPT Some attribute names are used in consistent ways, as reflected by their comments. A few seem to have different semantics. The latter should be avoided, particularly where inheritance of attribute value is presumed. For XML applications, a similar set of general attributes may be useful. A common occurrence is to specialize a general element name to indicate a local variation on the general element type. For example, in electronic books, different books have different names for the hierarchic sectioning. Some use chapter, some use part, some use section, some use "El Parto". Regards/Harvey Bingham
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 1999 18:25:18 UTC