- From: Bryan Campbell <bryany@pathcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 18:07:57 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At 12:30 PM 18-08-98 -0100, cltrar@login.dknet.dk (Claus Thoegersen) wrote: >In article <199808141356.IAA20198@staff1.cso.uiuc.edu>, >Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu> wrote: >>Response to Claus Thøgersen. >>We need to keep the mind the naive user. >Do you mean that the possibility of reconfiguring keys placement will >be a threat to the naive user? If this is the case then you can >simply make it hard to make these adjustments, e.g. require the user >to use a special commandline swich to load an alternative >configuration, and "hide" the help topics that discusses these >possibilities under advanced settings. Hi, I think the goal of the Group is to make all computers easy to use for disabled people. Extensive configuration decreases that possibility. More importantly I believe the Group has the knowledge to recommend 3 or 4 (maybe 8) QWERTY keyboard options covering the needs of almost all disabled people. After 11 years of DOS & Windows (& 9 years CP/M before that) computing with 5 macro programs I'm totally at ease with making new keyboard controls. Yet it would have been *much* better to have things more laid out. It would be great to let buyers make changes once there is a solid base to build on. Newcomers (& disabled people using a different computer) should be able to reach a reasonable level of usability in minutes. Keyboard profiles that blend various platforms to disabled buyers will be most helpful for a great "Out of Box Experience"! More customization could follow as familiarity grows. Regards, Bryan -> "Just because we call it the Web does not mean its supposed to tangle people up!"
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 1998 18:06:59 UTC