- From: Kitch Barnicle <kitch@afb.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:33:25 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I agree that measuring "improved access" is vague. The charter also says that we will "Evaluate the usability of accessibility features" under 2.1 scope of work items. What if instead we say something like, "Establish a mechanism for having users with disabilities test the usability of user agent features." I think it would be important to get feedback formally or informally from users who are not directly connected with the WAI activities. And then, under "Criteria for success of user agent WG include:" say something like, -Adoption of guidelines by user agent developers -Documented use of user agent accessibility features by persons with disabilities with or without assistive technology. Actually I don't know if documenting feature use is beyond our scope, but it seems like it would be important to determine whether or not certain features were being used successfully. Kitch >How do we measure success? Items 2 "improved access to the WWW by PWD" is >really vague and unmeasurable. > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 1998 08:34:35 UTC