- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 16:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Kathy Hewitt <kathyhe@microsoft.com>
- cc: "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@access.digex.net>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
in the interest of providing the most universal access, the entire documentation online, manual, and other including the sereal number of the cd should be available in a conventional electronic form. On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Kathy Hewitt wrote: > Then maybe instead of putting the entire online documentation under the > umbrella of providing it in plain text, it should just be those parts > relating to accessibility? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Gilman [mailto:asgilman@access.digex.net] > Sent: Monday, June 15, 1998 12:54 PM > To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > Subject: Re: UA documentation > > > to follow up on what Kathy Hewitt said: > > > If the online documentation is accessible, then it shouldn't be > > necessary to have it in plain text. > > There may be a Catch-22 here. Who is the documentation of the > Web client for? Someone who doesn't fully understand how to > use the Web client. To be fit for use by the intended audience, > maybe the Web client documentation should not be hidden behind > the Web client UI? > > The standards for the user's safety net are appropriately more > severe [as regards accessibility] than the standards for general > Web literature. Just as fire escapes have to be more fireproof. > > Al > Hands-On-Technolog(eye)s touching the internet voice: 1-(301) 949-7599 poehlman@clark.net ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://www.clark.net/pub/poehlman
Received on Monday, 15 June 1998 16:30:16 UTC