- From: Kathy Hewitt <kathyhe@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 11:38:24 -0700
- To: "'David Poehlman'" <poehlman@clark.net>, "Charles (Chuck) Oppermann" <chuckop@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Kitch Barnicle <kitch@afb.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
If the online documentation is accessible, then it shouldn't be necessary to have it in plain text. -----Original Message----- From: David Poehlman [mailto:poehlman@clark.net] Sent: Monday, June 15, 1998 10:27 AM To: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann Cc: Kitch Barnicle; w3c-wai-ua@w3.org Subject: RE: UA documentation the online help would be nice to have in plaintext. On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote: > << > Do we need to say something about the accessibility of on-line > documentation? The current draft makes reference to having materials > available in alternative formats. But should we say that on-line help > systems should follow the page authoring guidelines? > >> > > Also, the systems that display the help can also be accessible. > > Both Netscape Navigator and Internet Explorer use HTML for help, yet, the > relative accessibility between the two systems are vastly different. Our > HTMLHelp engine has a few problems with accessibility that we are working > on. > Hands-On-Technolog(eye)s touching the internet voice: 1-(301) 949-7599 poehlman@clark.net ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://www.clark.net/pub/poehlman
Received on Monday, 15 June 1998 14:38:08 UTC