- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 21:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: "UA WAI UserAgent (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
isn't the title downloaded anyway along with the rest of the source? so all we are doing is reformatting what's already there? On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > This is a powerful safetynet type of idea - but we have to be > careful in implementation or this could cause a LOT of extra web > traffic. and slow page loading... if every page without alt > text does a fetch of the title for each of the links on the page. > > However, if we set it up so that it is not done automatically it > should be fine. That is, if it were a user option or done on > user request. Then the titles would only be fetched if the > user was looking at blank image anchors and had no idea what they > pointed to. No substitute for ALT, but a very nice safety net. > > So this would really be a UA issue primarily - with titles being > important for it to work. So I will post this (separately) over > there. > > Gregg > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jan Richards > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 1998 1:48 PM > To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org > Subject: Re: alt-text idea... > > > Hi, > > I agree. It may be a good last chance solution for browsers but > it > shouldn't become an ALT text substitute. We may howeve want to > emphasize good TITLE-ing of documents within authoring tools. > > - Jan > > William Loughborough wrote: > > > > Ian sends from Wendy: "Another possible use of the TITLE > element is to > > provide alt-text for images used as linke to pages when authors > don't > > provide alt-text. In this case, a brower could grab the > contents of the > > TITLE element of the document being pointed to and use this as > the > > alt-text." > > > > WL:: I don't think this is the venue for this because: 1) it > doesn't > > deal with authoring *Tool* possibilities, rather is mainly for > browsers; > > 2) it's not likely to "provide [USEFUL] alt-text for images..." > since > > the TITLE isn't apt to give much info about any particular IMG. > > -- > > Love. > > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE > > http://dicomp.pair.com > Hands-On-Technolog(eye)s touching the internet voice: 1-(301) 949-7599 poehlman@clark.net ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://www.clark.net/pub/poehlman
Received on Sunday, 14 June 1998 21:58:13 UTC