Re: next validator

At 06:22 a.m. 06/18/98 -0700, William Loughborough wrote:
>1) Having two "validators" is cumbersome.  They also create a problem:
>if I validate the HTML, then use Bobby to get approval and use the URI
>from it as the link to prove the site is still accessible, the HTML no
>longer validates because the address of the Bobby test contains
>something ("&browser" and "&output") that chokes it (but shouldn't since
>it's an address inside quotation marks and shouldn't be subject to the
>same constraints as HTML code).

Change these inside the quote marks to "&browser" and
"&output".

--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@hwg.org>
Vice President, Marketing and Outreach, HTML Writers Guild
  http://www.hwg.org
Education & Outreach working group member, Web Accessibility Initiative
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/

Received on Thursday, 18 June 1998 11:58:43 UTC