Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Unnecessary visually hidden text

Quickfire reply just on the latest thought on 1.3.1: yes, 1.3.1 *can* be 
used in my view to justify failing something that clearly has visually 
been styled to not "exist" or be there, but is nonetheless exposed to 
SRs. Though I'd wield this sword with some nuance, and only fail 
egregiously bad cases. For my part, I've been known to fail things like 
"even though the hamburger menu is visually closed, when using SR I can 
still read through its entire content in browse mode, so you've not 
hidden it properly"

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

* https://www.splintered.co.uk/
* https://github.com/patrickhlauke
* https://flickr.com/photos/redux/
* https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke

Received on Friday, 17 October 2025 10:17:16 UTC