Re: Skip to content link

Well basically the h1 is directly below the main landmark...so it does take you there...but what im saying is EVERY page is now focused there...I believe it is because the 'action' attribute has not been used on the form tag.


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>

________________________________
From: Bristow, Alan <Alan.Bristow@elections.ca>
Sent: 07 March 2024 13:35
To: Tom Shaw <tom-shaw@hotmail.com>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Skip to content link

GOV.UK are invariably very well considered pages, so I am intrigued/surprised that their skip link doesn't go to H1 on each page.

Sorry this does not directly answer your question, but, if the skip always did go to H1 then it would (I assume) solve the issue perhaps?

I'd be interested to find why a GOV.UK page main skip does not skip to H1.

Regards,

Alan

. . . . -   . . - - -
Alan Bristow ( he / him / il )
Web Developer / Développeur Web
Elections Canada / Élections Canada
alan.bristow@elections.ca<mailto:alan.bristow@elections.ca>

________________________________
From: Tom Shaw <tom-shaw@hotmail.com>
Sent: 07 March 2024 08:11
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: Skip to content link

Ce message a été envoyé par un expéditeur externe. Veuillez faire preuve de prudence et ne pas cliquer sur les liens ou ouvrir les pièces jointes à moins de reconnaître l'expéditeur et de savoir que le contenu est sûr.

This message was sent from an external sender. Please exercise caution and do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Hi there.

I have a very long GOV.UK process with lots of pages. The first page I activate the skip to content link and it works as expected, however, for the rest of the hjourney users are now automatically taken to the main content everytime because the anchor in the URL #main-content' is always there. So it often skips the h1, hint text, back link etc....therefore I'd say affecting SR and KO users. I understand this is a potentially a backend mistake but I still feel this falls under 2.4.3 Focus Order? Is this right?

Thank you.