- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:25:43 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Serious question: why are you apparently keen on failing this? What actual problem does it cause to users? This lens (looking at what the problem is, rather than the underlying markup) is more likely to yield better results. For instance, once you look beyond "oh no, it uses a TABLE", you may actually find that regardless of the underlying markup, the page has issues when it comes to Reflow, for instance. If it doesn't cause actual problems, is the sad face more about not having a kudgel anymore to beat developers over the head with to not implement "bad" markup? That was never the point/intention of WCAG... P -- Patrick H. Lauke * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ * https://github.com/patrickhlauke * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 4 March 2024 14:25:52 UTC