Re: Website with known set of issues

I think in this case we might suppose it is more like how OS development
used to work, that is to say you did not start developing for where the
hardware was at the time you started but where it would be when you
shipped.

With WCAG versions we can sort of see how widespread things can be expected
to reasonably be based on legal standards, so we might assume reasonably
widespread compliance with WCAG 2.0 in 2025-2026, might as well start
pushing now - just my feeling.

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 7:11 PM Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
wrote:

> actually, Steve's comment raises a question.
> I recall last week a post about early reviews of WCAG 3.
>
> May I ask what evaluation method the w3c uses to confirm that enough
> compliance  with current wcAG criteria exists before starting a updated
> set?
> Speaking personally, should not a uniform baseline for end users exists
> before  companies and organizations find themselves faced with changes?
> Just wondering,
>
> Karen
>
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2024, Steve Green wrote:
>
> > Note that that GDS page was created early in 2018, so it predates both
> WCAG 2.1 and 2.2. Another 18 level A and AA success criteria have been
> added since then.
> >
> > Steve Green
> > Managing Director
> > Test Partners Ltd
> >
> >
> > From: Kevin White <kevin@dewoollery.co.uk>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 5:16 PM
> > To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: WAI Interest Group discussion list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>; Shawn Henry
> <shawn@w3.org>
> > Subject: Re: Website with known set of issues
> >
> > Hi Phill,
> >
> > Not sure if it would meet your needs but GDS did testing of
> accessibility tools on a standard set of failures<
> https://alphagov.github.io/accessibility-tool-audit/test-cases.html> that
> they presented in a single page. The association with success criteria is
> clear but not explicitly linked.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > P.s. Would love to update Before/After demo!
> >
> >
> > On 21 May 2024, at 16:40, Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com<mailto:
> pjenkins@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a website (or set) with a known set of issues mapped to all the
> WCAG 2.2 Success Criteria?
> >
> > In other words, “this set of pages demonstrates failures for all the
> WCAG Success Criteria”.
> >
> > There is that decades old Before After demo website<
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/Overview.html> created by W3C that was
> an initial attempt to do something like that. However, it is woefully out
> of date.
> > I’ve head that there may be some web pages maintained by a university or
> organization for spot testing or spot demos, but a curated list would be
> very helpful for the community.
> >
> > _______
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phill Jenkins
> > IBM Accessibility, IBM Design
> > Equal Access toolkit and accessibility checker at ibm.com/able/<
> https://www.ibm.com/able/>
> > “Without accessibility, there is no diversity, equity, or inclusion for
> disabled people”
> >
> >