- From: Guy Hickling <guy.hickling@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:26:01 +0000
- To: WAI Interest Group discussion list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAcXHNJ=ZbkLeQ=vBf_T61_p+xxAB=Q8r9B5F4JacJA7NBiuyg@mail.gmail.com>
I have raised this same point before, in connection with other SCs where the Understanding document either restricts, or in some cases totally changes the meaning of the SC itself. There is a general poor procedure here, that needs to be reconsidered by W3C and procedures improved for the future. We sometimes spent weeks, even months, several people all haggling over the wording of a proposed SC in a determined effort to get the wording absolutely as watertight as we possibly good. But then, after all that hard work, the task of writing the Understanding document, to go with it, appears (so far as I could see) to be given mainly to one person in the Group at W3C to write. True, it was possible for the public to comment later on the Understanding document when a later draft of the update was published. But that was not usually immediately following the discussions about the SC wording. The process relied on those people individually remembering to, and finding time to, check for themselves, maybe some weeks later when the next version was released, since that would be the first time they saw a (possibly revised) Understanding doc. And it needed people to feel that proposing amendments to a draft Understanding were going to be listened to, which was not always entirely obvious. I think it needs a process to link the two parts of the work, so that the people who shared in the SC's formulation are all invited to look at the Understanding doc, to check that what has been written into it is in agreement with the SC. That should be done BEFORE the next WCAG draft is published, in order to reduce the time delay before those people see what will be going into the Understanding doc. In the case of SC3.3.8, all it needed was for the Understanding document to be amended to say something like, "The purpose of this Success Criterion is to ensure there is an ... method to log in OR PERFORM OTHER AUTHENTICATION PROCEDURES". (The extra text needed shown in capitals.) I hope it is still not too late now to amend this Understanding document.
Received on Monday, 13 November 2023 21:26:18 UTC