- From: Milan Regec <milan.regec@hey.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:49:32 +0100
- To: Ms J <ms.jflz.woop@gmail.com>, IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Mark Applin <mark@signly.co>
- Message-ID: <ec1b33517f1a148afebb5112667e41790e05fa51@hey.com>
Hey, firstly, I agree that deaf users using sign language are at great disadvantage when it comes to digital or any written content. Level of comprehension among the group is indeed lower than the rest of the population. Also, availability of assisting technologies for these users is slim. Here are some thoughts on the topic: * Numbers of users of sign language (as their primary language) is shrinking due to alternative options (medical and technological). * Primarily taught sign language is not universal across the globe (I know there is an International Sign Language). * Sign languages often have different grammar and overall structure than written text, it is not just a matter of converting written words into corresponding signs. * For instance in Slovak we have two different variants: "Slovak Sign Language" and "Signed Slovak", the first is a comprehensive language on its own, the second is just linear conversion of words into signs. For deaf people brought up using "signing method" the first option is much more comprehensible and preferred, the second can be related to written text - just a different set of "characters". While easier to implement into assistive technology, it might not offer significant advantage over the written text. * There are initiatives for developing an AI driven avatars converting written text / spoken language into sign language. I have not come across practical application yet, just flashy demos and promises, but this work is in progress and I am hopeful. To Sarah reflecting the link she sent - as for the augmenting visual effects - in terms of WCAG for me it falls into category of assistive technology and that is something users should pick on their own. Some users can prefer a vibrating device for augumentation of sound effects for instance. SYQEL itself is just an eye-candy tool to glue viewers into to video stream for couple seconds longer. A deaf person can just run EQ visualisers on their own, this technology is decades old. Have a lovely day, Milan On November 6, 2023, Mark Applin <mark@signly.co> wrote: > Thanks Sarah! > > > > Bests > > Mark / Book a meeting > <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/57be1e99fd604fa58b2ebf60f1727205@signly.co/meetingtype/HJZMoN60ukKhlM2junYKhQ2?anonymous&ep=owaSlotsCopyLink> > > > > From: Ms J <ms.jflz.woop@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 12:26 PM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Audio visualisations > > > > Hello > > From: Ms J <ms.jflz.woop@gmail.com <mailto:ms.jflz.woop@gmail.com>> > Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 10:28:20 AM > To: > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>> > Subject: Audio visualisations > > > > Hello >
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2023 09:49:40 UTC