Re: Minimum font size requirement or guideline for accessbility

Yes David you are right it should have been "em" which is based on the 
size of a capital "M" and thus fully scale-able.

Thanks Richard

On 08/03/2023 13:12, David Woolley wrote:
> On 08/03/2023 12:33, richard userite wrote:
>> absolute measurements such as pixels
>
> As I understand it, pixel long ago ceased to mean pixel and now means 
> 1/96th of an inch.
>
>> proportional sizes such as "%" or "pt"
>
> "pt" is, as far as I know, still a typographer's point, which is as 
> absolute as "px", but using 72, rather than 96, as the divisor. Did 
> you mean "em"?
>

Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2023 15:20:49 UTC