- From: richard userite <richard@userite.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:20:32 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Yes David you are right it should have been "em" which is based on the size of a capital "M" and thus fully scale-able. Thanks Richard On 08/03/2023 13:12, David Woolley wrote: > On 08/03/2023 12:33, richard userite wrote: >> absolute measurements such as pixels > > As I understand it, pixel long ago ceased to mean pixel and now means > 1/96th of an inch. > >> proportional sizes such as "%" or "pt" > > "pt" is, as far as I know, still a typographer's point, which is as > absolute as "px", but using 72, rather than 96, as the divisor. Did > you mean "em"? >
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2023 15:20:49 UTC