- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 23:46:02 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 11/02/2023 23:33, Adam Cooper wrote: > Ironic, really, that a client may be paying dearly and in good faith for > something that doesn’t make their websites accessible for all users and > for which there is likely a simple solution. I strongly resent the implication here (and in Guy's points) that we as auditors hired explicitly to do a strict WCAG compliance assessment (often with the explicit end goal from the client to get an ACR) are somehow shortchanging and defrauding our clients... If *you* want to go above and beyond what you're being hired by your client to you ... you do you, boo. Implying that this is what we all *should* do and that those that don't are just not showing enough commitment to Sparkle Motion is...well, it's an opinion, for sure. P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2023 23:46:21 UTC