- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:38:17 +0000
- To: Hidde de Vries <hidde@hiddedevries.nl>
- CC: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <MW5PR15MB5242DC38AD33BAD4C037E728F5CE9@MW5PR15MB5242.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
How does your proposal using a simple browser search find the alternative content<https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Alternative-Content>? I suppose searching the source code will find the alt attribute… If this is the case, then it should be documented at https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20150924/#sc_a351 Regards, Phill Jenkins Accessibility Executive, IBM Design @pjenkins Slack: #accessibility-at-ibm<slack://channel/?team=T073LUXEU&id=C036P1CTN> Equal Access toolkit and accessibility checker at ibm.com/able/<https://www.ibm.com/able/> linkedin.com/in/philljenkins/<https://www.linkedin.com/in/philljenkins/> From: Hidde de Vries <hidde@hiddedevries.nl> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 2:16 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] ATAG A.3.5.1 and browser built-in search Hello, A question regarding ATAG A. 3. 5. 1, which reads: A. 3. 5. 1 Text Search: If the authoring tool provides an editing-view of text-based content, then the editing-view enables text search, such that all of the following are true: (Level AA)(a) ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hello, A question regarding ATAG A.3.5.1<https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20#sc_a351>, which reads: A.3.5.1 Text Search: If the authoring tool provides an editing-view<https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Editing-View> of text-based content, then the editing-view<https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Editing-View> enables text search, such that all of the following are true: (Level AA) * (a) All Editable Text: Any text content that is editable by the editing-view is searchable (including alternative content<https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-Alternative-Content>); and * (b) Match: Matching results can be presented to authors and given focus; and * (c) No Match: Authors are informed when no results are found; and * (d) Two-way: The search can be made forwards or backwards. I am currently reporting on a tool that does not provide text search itself. However, the tool is browser-based and the built-in browser search satisfies (in this case): a, b, c and d. Users are able to do the kind of searching that this SC descrbies, but it’s not because something the tool has built-in. Am I correct in assuming this tool can be claimed to meet A.3.5.1 by “enabling” text search (as it works in browsers with built-in search and does not actively _break_ that built-in search experience (eg by conditionally hiding editable content etc)). Best, Hidde de Vries
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2023 15:38:36 UTC