- From: James Nurthen <james@nurthen.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 15:41:25 -0700
- To: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOEMLYyPcjJ0pF1M=zQYrXGmds04iQz1cGEeyteKUhGWxztoDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Wolfgang, Please file a bug against the epub specification at https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/new The bug is in the line https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/blob/181828b283ee5e20546746057076d970e78ce1ea/epub33/common/js/add-caution-hd.js#L16 Thanks, James On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:04 AM <wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at> wrote: > Thanks Madeleine, > > > > Sounds plausible. I didn’t look up further instances of the issue.. > > > > Is W3C reading these list postings? Looks like they are addressed. > > > > > > > > *From:* Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 23, 2023 5:12 PM > *To:* wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: aria-level interpretation problem > > > > It looks to me like there is an error in the algorithm generating the > document. If you look at the Note callouts, they all have a heading level > one higher than the containing section; if you look at the Caution > callouts, they all concatenate the containing level with the digit one. I > suspect they were intended to add the two digits together rather than > concatenate them. > > > > -Madeleine > > > > *Madeleine Rothberg * > > *Senior Subject Matter Expert * > > [image: GBH] <https://www.wgbh.org/foundation/what-we-do/ncam> > > > > > > > > *From: *"wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at" < > wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at> > *Date: *Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 8:49 AM > *To: *Post WAI list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > *Subject: *aria-level interpretation problem > *Resent-From: *Post WAI list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 8:47 AM > > > > HI W3C and community, > > > > Is a misinterpretation of aria-level > 6 an issue for WCAG (SC 1.3.1, > 4.1.2) or a screen reader bug? > > > > For a while I already wondered as a SR-user, why W3C documents flag some > notes as H2. > > Now I inspected such a component at: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/epub-33/#sec-intro-relations > > > > In the source was no role=note but an aria-heading with an extraordinary > value for aria-level: > > > > <div class="caution" id="caution-0"> > > <div > > *role="heading"* > > *aria-level="31"* > > class="caution-title marker"> > > <span>Caution</span> > > </div> > > > > For this component , JAWS as well as NVDA announces “heading 2” in Chrome, > Edge and Firefox, each for desktop . > > > > Possible problems using higher levels are well known: > > *“On elements with role heading <https://w3c.github.io/aria/#heading>, > values for aria-level <https://w3c.github.io/aria/#aria-level> above 6 can > create difficulties for users.”* > > (https://w3c.github.io/aria/#aria-level) > > > > So, who has to be addressed for rectification? > > > > My preferred mode to get an overview and navigate documents bases on > heading hierarchy. And I know, I am not the only one. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wolfgang > > >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2023 22:42:52 UTC