- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:37:28 -0500
- To: "Marc Haunschild (Accessibility Consulting)" <marc.haunschild@accessibility.consulting>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFmg2sVm26Pbu8gZjdcWFW=gneXcSgpfavLJqEne1kVpEtQafA@mail.gmail.com>
How about taking advantage of the fact that aria-labeledby can take a list of space-separated values?... <span id="1">maths papers</span><button arial-labeledby="2 1"><span id="2">Download</span></button> <span id="3">geography papers</span><button arial-labeledby="4 3"><span id="4">Download</span></button> <span id="5">physics papers</span><button arial-labeledby="6 5"><span id="6">Download</span></button> JF On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:10 AM Marc Haunschild (Accessibility Consulting) <marc.haunschild@accessibility.consulting> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > There are meaningful labels, so no fail here. > > But they are not programmatically determinable. > > So here is the fail. > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > Marc Haunschild > https://Accessibility.Consulting > > Am 17.11.2022 um 12:23 schrieb Tom Shaw <Tom-Shaw@hotmail.com>: > > > Hi all. > > I'd like to quickly discuss button and specifically out of context. I > quote the following from WCAG 2.4.6 > > "When headings and labels are also correctly marked up and identified in > accordance with 1.3.1: Info and Relationships > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/info-and-relationships>, > this Success Criterion helps people who use screen readers by ensuring that > labels and headings are meaningful when read out of context, for example, > in an automatically generated list of headings/table of contents, or when > jumping from heading to heading within a page." > > > maths papers > <button>Download</button> > > geography papers > <button>Download</button> > > physics papers > <button>Download</button> > > So, what I'm reading from that is that it fails 2.4.6, but is there an > argument that this may also fail 1.3.1, too? As the visible labels that > help you identify the purpose of the fields are not programmatically > associated? > > As always thank you for your time I appreciate it! > > Tom > > (I will provide more context for my previous link issue later today) 🙂 > > > > -- *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility | W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor | "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2022 17:59:10 UTC