Re: Query regarding 1.3.4

On 08/11/2022 16:19, Bristow, Alan wrote:
> While the content may work perfectly in both and only fail when transitioning from one to the other, I see nothing that indicates working in the initial orientation is all that is needed.

Looking at the detailed explanation, it looks to me that this rule is 
about people who are unable to change the orientation, so I don't think 
it fails accessibility if things break on a change of orientation, as 
long as they work in either orientation, initially.

It's probably a usability failure, but usability failures are not 
considered accessibility failures if they affect able and disabled equally.

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2022 16:33:13 UTC