- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:33:14 +0100
- To: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 16/08/2022 10:31, bryan rasmussen wrote: > yeah but sometimes you have visually identifiable differences that you > have not made clear in your accessibility tree, that is what I suppose > would be the main case - and in that case can you argue well sighted > users can see that is an Ad but blind users of a screen reader have no > clue. As said, this depends on the specific context/situation. there's no blanket "this will always fail if not done a certain way". You can, in situations where visually something is made clear but not conveyed in underlying markup, make a case for something under 1.1.1 Non-text Content, or 1.3.1 Info and Relationships. But that will be case-specific. P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2022 09:33:27 UTC