- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:58:41 +1000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Louise, If you publish something on social media, in most places it is considered that you are the publisher, so you are responsible for making it accessible. I believe many people find that the twitter alt system works for the use case you described - and if not I would support Jonathan's suggestion. Having a tweet with a link, and expecting people to follow it to find out what the tweet said is not really an acceptable approach as I read WCAG, nor as I consider the situation just in terms of "what makes sense here?" Such are my thoughts.. cheers On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:58:41 +1000, Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Jonathan. We’ll have the testimonials on our webpage that we are > linking to so that’s probably the simplest approach. > > > > > > > > > From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> > > > Sent: 21 July 2021 13:55 > > To: Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Testimonial campaign cards - embedded text question > > > > > > > > > > > > You could provide a direct link to the text on your website or reply to > the tweet with the text. > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > GetOutlook for iOS > > > > > > ----- > > > > > From: Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 6:08:03 AM > > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > > Subject: Testimonial campaign cards - embedded text question > > > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or >open > attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > > We recently completed an audit of our website for images and alt text. > > > > > > > > One of the things we are trying to avoid going forward (unless it’s > necessary), is having images where the text in embedded. We >can do this > by posting the text next to an image on our website and make it look > attractive > still. However, in the case where we are using a twitter card on social > media that has a student testimonial of about 60 odd >words (see example > attached), does anyone know if the Twitter image description is even a > suitable alternative for creating some >social > media “alt text”: > https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/picture-descriptions. And have > we failed accessibility by following a certain practice >on the web, but > not on Twitter? > > > > > > > Sorry it’s slightly on a tangent if related but would just appreciate > your thoughts on this as both web and social will often >work > hand-in-hand on this. > > > > > > > Best > > > > Louise > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the > addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient >please > immediately notify the sender, permanently and securely delete any > copies and do not take action with it > or in reliance on it. Any views expressed are the author's and do not > represent those of IOP, except where specifically stated. >IOP takes > reasonable precautions to protect against viruses but accepts no > responsibility for loss or damage arising from virus > infection. For the protection of IOP's systems and staff emails are > scanned automatically.. > > > > Institute of Physics. Registered charity no. 293851 (England & Wales) > and SCO40092 (Scotland) > > Registered Office: 37 > Caledonian Road, London, N1 9BU > > > Your privacy is important to us. For information about how IOP uses your > personal data, > > please see our Privacy Policy > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the > addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient >please > immediately notify the sender, permanently and securely delete any > copies and do not take action with it or in reliance >on it. Any views > expressed are the author's and do not represent those of IOP, except > where specifically stated. IOP takes >reasonable precautions to protect > against viruses but accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising > from virus infection. >For the protection of IOP's systems and staff > emails are scanned automatically.. > > > Institute of Physics. Registered charity no. 293851 (England & Wales) > and SCO40092 (Scotland) > > Registered Office: 37 Caledonian Road, London, N1 9BU > > > > > Your privacy is important to us. For information about how IOP uses your > personal data, please see our Privacy Policy > > > > > ----- > > > -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2021 14:00:11 UTC