- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:46:07 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 09/03/2021 16:05, Annie Heckel wrote: > “Parts of graphics required to understand the content, except when a > particular presentation of graphics is essential to the information > being conveyed.” > > First, I don’t know that I even fully understand that last part. It > sounds like graphics must meet the ratio unless they’re important. This > doesn’t sound logical, but I’m sure I’m wrong. I would have thought an example of this would have been illustrations of traffic signs (or more generally safety signs). They would need to be rendered in the legally standardised colours, even if that didn't give adequate contrast. Also, illustrations of living things to help in identification.
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2021 16:47:01 UTC