- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:40:05 +0100
- To: "Pearson, Amy" <apearson@apa.org>, Marc Haunschild <haunschild@mhis.onmicrosoft.de>, W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Yes, the "Read the journal article" heading should be an h2. Arguably, so should the "Contact" heading. In terms of placement I would be tempted to move it to the end of the article text that appears on the page, but before the meta information about the article and its authors. So after the last line of the text: "... be able to prevent many of the long-term health consequences of early-life adversity,” she says." But before: "Article: “Biological Aging in Childhood and Adolescence Following Experiences of Threat and Deprivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” by Natalie..." That way the summary is read before taking the decision about reading the full article. You could also put the heading and link after the meta data, this is all subjective. If the same heading pattern is used consistently it also creates an experience strategy for screen reader users, in that once they know that there is a heading prefacing a link to the full version of the article, they can opt to bypass the summary version and go straight to the heading/link. Putting it after the summary version also removes a tab stop for keyboard users before they get into the summary version. It's only one tab stop, so probably not much of an inconvenience, but it may add a little extra usability. Léonie -- Director @TetraLogical https://tetralogical.com
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2020 13:40:22 UTC