- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:39:03 +0100
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 16/10/2019 13:28, Alastair Campbell wrote: >> Devil's advocating: for a mouse user, is the "point of interaction" not the tip of their mouse pointer? > > I have assumed it is, does that not align with the definition? > > For "The point of interaction for the user’s input." > I was trying not to assume what the input was, or that you couldn't have more than one concurrently. If I tab somewhere on a web page, or click on an input field, but then move the mouse pointer...where's my "focus"? That's when you end up back with "keyboard focus" and "mouse focus" >> Are there any other places in the spec (possibly in >> understanding) where the concept of what focus IS has been elaborated? > > Yes, lots, it has a big ripple effect. Not in normative text (thankfully) but lots of places in understanding documents/techniques. Thinking more that perhaps we can gather them and see if they can be frankensteined or synthesized into a generic-enough definition that doesn't clash with them. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 15:39:06 UTC