- From: Davis, Angela (ITS) <Angela.Davis@its.ny.gov>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 17:58:21 +0000
- To: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CH2PR09MB4585B94857BF03C89B6F2ABCBAD70@CH2PR09MB4585.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Sure. I have a check box. When clicked it shows an image. The image has text under it that is also in an aria-describedby. The text contains a link. When the check box receives focus the screen reader does not tell me the text has a link in it. It reads the whole caption as plain text which is what it should do. My question is what wcag 2.0 standard would be violated if a user is not told a link is present? [cid:image001.png@01D54DF1.55700740] Label 1 [cid:image002.png@01D54DF1.55700740] This is an image. For more information visit more information about this image. From: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 1:42 PM To: Davis, Angela (ITS) <Angela.Davis@its.ny.gov>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: links in aria-describedby ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Angela, Your question does not make sense. Can you be more specific and give a code example? Alan Smith From: Davis, Angela (ITS)<mailto:Angela.Davis@its.ny.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 1:10 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Subject: links in aria-describedby Hi, If a link is in an aria-describedby what wcag 2.0 guide line would be violated? I’m thinking it would violate 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value Level A but I want to be sure. Thank you, Angela Davis Information Technology Specialist 2 NYS Office of Information Technology Services Citizen Services Cluster | Application Systems Engineering
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/png attachment: image002.png
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2019 17:58:46 UTC