Re: Indicating required fields mandatory or not (SC 3.3.2 or 2.4.6)

On 31/07/2019 09:18, Gerard Copinga wrote:

> Are there other people on this list who do (legal) evaluations? And how 
> would you deal with this?

I'll echo the general sentiment that especially for evaluations/audits 
that have a legal aspect to them, you as an auditor have to be VERY 
conservative in what you pass/fail when it falls within gray areas, and 
it's generally about the very literal reading of the normative wording 
of the SC only. Unless you can provide fairly watertight proof that your 
particular interpretation is correct and accepted, you sometimes have to 
clarify when something "follows the normative wording, but we'd still 
recommend you do X" instead.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2019 08:35:34 UTC