- From: Mitchell Evan <mtchllvn@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:31:10 -0700
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK=xW6ugo=GaExubDXGb+Sg1yy9gEfyWaq46-gGqNMez+9n_bA@mail.gmail.com>
>> Are other methods to (such as aria-hidden="true") valid > > Techniques are not exhaustive. Failure techniques should fail always > (i.e. if you do this, it's a fail), while positive techniques are only > ever to be considered one of a series of possible approaches that > satisfy the underlying criterion. So short answer, yes. I agree, other methods are valid. Yet failure F38 <https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F38> as currently written disallows modern techniques such as responsible use of aria-hidden=true. So I've filed a bug: "F38 disallows techniques that actually satisfy 1.1.1". https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/828 Mitchell Evan mtchllvn@gmail.com +1 (510) 375-6104 mobile On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:56 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 22/07/2019 15:58, Andrew Ly wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm reaching out since my organization has been working on updating our > > policies to be fully AODA compliant and accessible for all audiences. > > > > The success criterion around images has been rather specific and on our > > end and we wanted to get some clarification. > > > > F30: > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F30 > > Would it be considered a failure for this success criteria if alt text > > was present (describing the image to help search crawlers better > > understand the image), but the image is considered decorative and hidden > > (role="presentation", or aria-hidden="true" for screen readers)? > > > > Alt text is typically used to help us better optimize our pages and > > content for search engines and by stripping it out completely across the > > majority of images being decorative could have a significant impact on > > our visibility overall. > > As Alan already said, this sounds more like an attempt at > keyword-stuffing, or could be perceived that way by search engines > anyway and penalised. Optimise your content for human audiences first > and foremost, and search engines (that try to actually perceive the page > as a human audience would) will appropriately rank/categorise it. If > you're having issues with pages appearing for certain phrases, then > perhaps optimise your actual visible text. > > > F38: > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F38 > > In this criteria, only role="presentation" is identified as being the > > success criteria to mark up decorative images with to hide it from > > assistive technology. > > > > Are other methods to (such as aria-hidden="true") valid > > Techniques are not exhaustive. Failure techniques should fail always > (i.e. if you do this, it's a fail), while positive techniques are only > ever to be considered one of a series of possible approaches that > satisfy the underlying criterion. So short answer, yes. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2019 05:31:47 UTC