- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 15:39:27 +0000
- To: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DBBPR09MB304573F2023C81938366AB05B90B0@DBBPR09MB3045.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Everyone, Hopefully people will get a chance to review the slides and/or video I posted from Michael Gilbert and the team at Google [1]. Michael is now on this email group so can join in. I thought I start the comments with what I took way from the results: * The structure of the criteria text gives us some flexibility, where it says “Visual information required to identify user interface components and states”, if research finds that X, Y & Z other factors make the contrast irrelevant in a particular scenario that can be addressed fairly easily. That is already the case for buttons where the understanding doc [2] says buttons don’t require borders. * The remit of the guidelines is to prevent barriers that affect people with disabilities, it would be useful to have a control group or a comparison with other usability testing to help work out which factors impact people with low vision, compared to a general audience. (Not that it is a deciding factor, but it’s part of the equation.) * I fully appreciate that more examples would help, but to make that a manageable task it would help to know which types of component people have struggled to apply the criteria to. Presumably the examples in the understanding document [2] cover some cases, which other components are people concerned with? * This criteria (non-text contrast) is focused on having contrast for certain aspects, but it does not require particular design approaches/affordances. E.g. if an input doesn’t have any border it isn’t required to have a contrasting one. However, lack of affordance is an issue for many folk (particularly with cognitive impairments [3]), it would be great to re-run the study with participants with cognitive impairments. I’d just note that my brain is fairly wired-up to how the guidelines work, so I hope people less biased by that can comment as well 😊 Kind regards, -Alastair 1] Page with video and link to slides: https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag21-examples/ntc-research-video.html NB: If the slides don’t work in your screenreader make sure the accessibility setting is on: https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6282736 2] Understanding doc: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/non-text-contrast.html 3] COGA doc: https://w3c.github.io/coga/techniques/index.html#use-clear-visual-affordances -- www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc
Received on Friday, 17 May 2019 15:39:54 UTC