- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 16:49:25 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 04/05/2019 16:03, Marc Haunschild wrote: > I still think about the problem and in my opinion it’s a problem > violating a wcag success criterion > > We have success criterion 2.5.3 in wcag 2.1 (Label in name > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/label-in-name>). > > I think: The buttons for sorting a table are interface components in the > meaning of this success criterion. So it seems to me even the is on my > side (not that I care 😉 - But i do care about accessibility issues, > even when they are not covered by wcag)... Normatively, 2.5.3 is only concerned with readable text - punctuation, or any other characters/graphics/symbols, are excluded from it. Of course, accessibility goes beyond just WCAG, but you can't bend the interpretation of the SC to a fail when it normatively isn't :) P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Saturday, 4 May 2019 15:49:50 UTC