Re: Only one h1 per page?

Katie and working group, 
if we did indeed "moved back to the one-H1, then H2, etc."
then the sufficient techniques and failure techniques will need another 
review and edit.  For example, https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H42.html
has as Example 2: Headings in a 3-column layout
. . . in the example, the layout could be presented with the first heading 
in each column at the same logical level (such as an h1),
 
I do not believe there ever was guidance or agreement that only one-h1 was 
required always and everywhere, or it would have been a Success Criterion 
by itself.  I believe it is more of a guidance or best practice that most 
of the time and in many places it is recommended to have only one h1. 
George's example of an e-pub ( web site) of a book with chapters where 
every chapter heading is tagged (programmatically identified) as an h1 is 
a good example. 
___________
Regards,
Phill Jenkins
Accessibility Executive
IBM Accessibility
linkedin.com/in/philljenkins/
www.ibm.com/able
twitter.com/IBMAccess
ageandability.com




From:   Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
To:     Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc:     raquel.moreno.carmena@gmail.com, WAI Interest Group 
<w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Date:   12/10/2018 08:21 AM
Subject:        Re: Only one h1 per page?



Raquel,

Thanks Steve! The long and short of that article is that HTML 5 tried to 
implements new outline rules but it was never really implemented by the 
browsers - therefore - we moved back to the one-H1, then H2, etc.
* katie * 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect, 
Vice President of Accessibility at EverFi, 
Board Member and W3C Advisory Committee Rep for Knowbility 
WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy, IAAP CPACC+WAS = 
CPWA
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, but they will 
never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to 
dictate where we are going.




On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:42 AM Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 
wrote:
hi Raquel,

this may be helpful in regards to practicality of hading level usage 
http://html5doctor.com/computer-says-no-to-html5-document-outline/
--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C


On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 13:31, Raquel <raquel.moreno.carmena@gmail.com> 
wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I made a talk about accessibility. I needed to talk about what 
I'd learnt after making a lot of mistakes, because of a lack of knowledge. 
I had a lack of empathy, because a lack of information/knowledge..
I read a lot of documentation about accessibility and I found the 
recommendation about "only one h1 per page" in several resources, but now 
I realize that W3C doesn't include it explicitly.
Now, I'm worry about it, because I also told it in my talk. I added a 
disclaimer at the beginning of the talk: I'm not a specialist on 
accessibility. But I would like to fix my errors if I told something 
wrong.
I've continued reading about it and I've found several articles (not in 
WAI). They explain that it's a recommendation for previous versions of 
HTML, not for HTML5. You don't have to worry about the order of the rest 
of the headings if you add a <section> or <article>. In other words, you 
can start by h1 again in an <article>, for example. I wonder if assistive 
technology is ready for it.
Please, where can I find more information about this issue? Is it a valid 
recommendation? Does this recommendation make sense with HTML5? 
I'll write a post about my talk very soon, so I can take that opportunity 
to clarify this issue. I can also fix my shared slides.
Thanks in advance for your time!
Best regards,
Raquel

Received on Monday, 10 December 2018 14:51:36 UTC