- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:37:03 +0000
- To: raquel.moreno.carmena@gmail.com
- Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vn2kX-MmjwOOLKCQz8=gmjwPo-iVdjLA8aFmN1Qw1ercg@mail.gmail.com>
hi Raquel, this may be helpful in regards to practicality of hading level usage http://html5doctor.com/computer-says-no-to-html5-document-outline/ -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 13:31, Raquel <raquel.moreno.carmena@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Recently, I made a talk about accessibility. I needed to talk about what > I'd learnt after making a lot of mistakes, because of a lack of knowledge. > I had a lack of empathy, because a lack of information/knowledge.. > I read a lot of documentation about accessibility and I found the > recommendation about "only one h1 per page" in several resources, but now I > realize that W3C doesn't include it explicitly. > > Now, I'm worry about it, because I also told it in my talk. I added a > disclaimer at the beginning of the talk: I'm not a specialist on > accessibility. But I would like to fix my errors if I told something wrong. > > I've continued reading about it and I've found several articles (not in > WAI). They explain that it's a recommendation for previous versions of > HTML, not for HTML5. You don't have to worry about the order of the rest of > the headings if you add a <section> or <article>. In other words, you can > start by h1 again in an <article>, for example. I wonder if assistive > technology is ready for it. > > Please, where can I find more information about this issue? Is it a valid > recommendation? Does this recommendation make sense with HTML5? > > I'll write a post about my talk very soon, so I can take that opportunity > to clarify this issue. I can also fix my shared slides. > > Thanks in advance for your time! > > Best regards, > > Raquel >
Received on Monday, 10 December 2018 13:38:07 UTC