W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2018

Re: double underscore with meaning

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:19:28 +0100
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <9e5a375a-63dd-3124-2d53-ca70dbbe2f51@splintered.co.uk>
On 06/09/2018 18:05, Felix Miata wrote:

> Semantically, an appropriate character instead of CSS:
> 
> https://unicode-search.net/unicode-namesearch.pl?term=UNDERSCORE
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underscore

Is that announced/exposed by assistive technologies in any way?


> 
>> The fact that the row header already says "Total ..." is arguably
>> sufficient I'd say.
> 
> Nope. This convention is well over a century old, the source of the term "bottom
> line". Those who skim balance sheets, income and cash flow statements for the
> bottom line focus on the number column.
> 
> If it wasn't for accountants, personal computers would have taken many years
> longer, or may never have, become the ubiquitous tools that they did. The double
> underscore isn't going away.

Did anybody here say "don't provide a visual double underscore"? No. The 
question was about how to convey this not just visually.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2018 17:19:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:37:20 UTC